01-19-2024, 02:29 AM
Ruling on trading in digital currencies
Encrypted digital currencies are not subject to any government authority or oversight, nor do they impose any fees or commissions on financial transactions that take place using them. The first digital currency appeared in 2009 by a person named Satoshi Nakamoto, who created it with the aim of using it as an alternative to digital currencies in payment operations. that take place in electronic financial transactions.
التجارة في العملات الرقمية
Encrypted digital currencies are just electronic forms or numbers that have been programmed by some people using computers. They do not have any tangible physical existence, and they do not have any cost except just the electricity used to operate computers. One of the most important differences between them and paper currencies is that paper currencies It is issued by central banks in each country. Accordingly, scholars differed in determining the ruling on trading in digital currencies, and the ruling was divided into two groups, namely jurisprudential jurisprudence and ijtihad consideration.
Encrypted digital currencies are not subject to any government authority or oversight, nor do they impose any fees or commissions on financial transactions that take place using them. The first digital currency appeared in 2009 by a person named Satoshi Nakamoto, who created it with the aim of using it as an alternative to digital currencies in payment operations. that take place in electronic financial transactions.
التجارة في العملات الرقمية
Encrypted digital currencies are just electronic forms or numbers that have been programmed by some people using computers. They do not have any tangible physical existence, and they do not have any cost except just the electricity used to operate computers. One of the most important differences between them and paper currencies is that paper currencies It is issued by central banks in each country. Accordingly, scholars differed in determining the ruling on trading in digital currencies, and the ruling was divided into two groups, namely jurisprudential jurisprudence and ijtihad consideration.